In another example, Surowiecki illustrates the intelligence
in the crowd's opinion by citing findings from the television quiz show "Who
Wants to Be a Millionaire?" Participants on this show, if you remember,
could choose help in answering specific questions: either to phone a friend
or ask the audience. The friend had presumably been selected on the basis of
his or her superior general knowledge, while the audience consisted of a
group of people with nothing better to do that afternoon than wander into a
TV studio. Over the life of the show, the friend (the so-called expert)
came up with the right answer 65% of the time, while the crowd had an
amazing 91% success rate. So how can we use the crowd's opinion to
our advantage?
Several groups
have developed futures markets to predict from the crowd’s opinion:
presidential elections (Iowa
Electronic Markets), new drugs (Eli
Lilly), new technologies--and the weekly close of the Nasdaq--(Technology
Review). The Defense Department even had the foresight to suggest a
market-based approach to forecast the likelihood of terrorist events (Policy
Analysis Market) before a squeamish Congress nixed the idea (Carl
Hulse, The New York Times).
In the stock market, the
price of a stock is set by people representing all sorts of levels of
information, intelligence, and resulting expectations: traders betting a
stock’s price direction over the next few minutes to weeks, long-term
investors expecting the value of their shares to rise and short-sellers
betting the price of a stock will fall. Through their collective buying and
selling, the market efficiently prices the value of a company's stock.
This crowd's
response to fear and greed manifests itself in predictable chart patterns,
e.g., the multi-day pullback after a period of steady rise followed by its
reversal at specific levels of symmetry (often common Fibonacci levels).
These are crowd responses that have played out the same way for the past 100
years.
Fibonacci ratios likely measure the balance between human
fear and greed, i.e., as price falls, fear dominates, and sellers rule, but
a point is reached where greed enters, an opportunity is perceived, buyers
again rule, and price climbs. I recently poled a group of 121
traders for their preference as to where they would expect the reversal of a
pullback to begin. They were shown a picture of rising daily bars (white
bars on Chart 1 without the percentages) and then asked to choose a point at
which they thought this pullback would most likely reverse: 1.7%
chose a 12% reversal, 0% a 19% reversal, 5% a
27% reversal, 77.4% either the 38, 50, or 62%
most common Fibonacci reversals, 9.2% a 75% reversal, and
5% a 91% reversal. It’s natural for the crowd to expect a
reversal at these three standard Fibonacci levels. That’s where they want
to step in to buy again! That's where they perceive the stock is a bargain
again! It's a natural symmetry expected by the crowd.
Sidebar
I would like to use the
power of you, the knowledgeable crowd, to predict the short-term market
action. Specifically, I want to ask whether you think the S&P 500 will be
up or down the following day. I want the information by ten pm. For my
part, I will compile the results and post them here. According to
Surowiecki's theory, even a few hundred people, acting independently with
their own informational sources and biases and level of expertise, can more
accurately assess tomorrow's price action than a few selected
professionals. If that's true, then we might be able to make the following
qualification: There is
c%
probability that the market will be up tomorrow. And with the support of
that knowledge, one could then make the decision to short, stay out of, or
go long the market. Interested in participating and receiving in turn the
compiled results? Send an email to
rmiller@triplescreenmethod.com.