TripleScreenMethod (TSM) Methodology and Results for 2004

Questions Answered

Several of you have asked me to describe exactly how one might apply the daily TSM data, so today, I'll describe two approaches:  investment and trading approaches.  Further, I'll present the 2004 results for both.  Just so you know my motivations, I'm an active trader/investor managing six accounts with over a million dollars.  I trade/invest the TSM method exclusively and write the TSM page primarily to prepare myself for the next day's market. Soon this will become a commercial site, and you'll need to assess whether it brings value to your trading. I would be interested in hearing about your experiences with the TSM approach (rmiller@triplescreenmethod.com).  Ask questions about the methodology, and I'll answer on this page so come back occasionally to update your understanding.

First, the method.  Longer term, one thing moves a stock's price, and that's earnings.  As an investor, I target earnings, revisions in earnings, and stability of earnings.  Over a shorter term, market psychology--evident in technical patterns--becomes important.  Once the-cream-of-the-crop stocks with regard to earnings have been identified, value is a consideration.  You might, for instance, find the best stock in the world, but if it's recognized as such, its price may have run up so high that no value is left.  Take DELL, for example, the best performer of the 90s; it climbed from a split adjusted $0.05 in January 1990 to $55.00 in March 1999 (+109,900 percent).  Unfortunately, DELL hasn't seen that price again.  Good fundamental stock, but at best, currently trading at $22.37, it's been dead money for five years.

Once a week, the TSM method starts with the entire universe of stocks (~6,500) and culls that number to less than 40 with three screens, two based on fundamentals and one on value:  proprietary earnings fundamentals, Zacks for earnings' and analysts' rankings revision fuel, and PEG (price/earnings/ earnings growth) ratios for value.  These ~40 TSM stocks can then be used two ways that I'll outline further:  to fund a personal mutual fund (folio) for investing and to provide a daily watch list for trading technical patterns. 

The fundamentals screen scores the universe of stocks by a number of fundamental criteria, primarily based on historical earnings data. 

TSM's second screen seeks out those stocks that are fueled to move.  Zacks gathers analysts' rankings, earnings estimates, and the revisions for both.  They then pool the data to provide proprietary stock rankings and earnings' estimates weighted by age of estimate and quality of analyst.  Zacks ranks stocks from best (1) to worst (5); they provide an independent measure form earnings quality stocks that are fueled to move.  From 1980, Zacks #1 ranked stocks have averaged returning +32.9 percent; from 2000 through 2002, when the market was tanking, Zacks #1 ranked stocks returned +43.8 percent and then 74.7 percent in 2003.  Further, from 12/05/03, if one bought the #1 ranked stocks weekly and held them for four week before selling, the return would have been an annualized +31.8 percent (+15.7 percent for the S&P 500), while the Zacks #2 & #3 ranked stocks returned a slightly less +26.4 and +21.5 percent, respectively.  With these returns, one might say, let's just invest in Zacks #1 stocks and be done with it.  The problem is there are too many (on average, 200 #1 ranked and 600 #2 ranked stocks).  Cross screening makes the number more manageable.  I advise everyone to read Mitch Zacks "Ahead of the Market" for a better understanding of the importance of earnings criteria and the quality of analysts' recommendations

To this point, we have identified a group of fundamentally sound stocks primed with fuel to make a bullish run.  The last question is value, and its best measure is the price-to-earnings-to-earnings growth ratio, i.e., the PEG ratio.  The lower the PEG ratio, the more undervalued the stock.  It's one of the few fundamental measures that accurately forecasts price movement over the next six months.  Find further description and supporting data here.  I limit its measure to the next 24 months (PEG '05 and PEG '06) because the only truly good measure analysts provide us is this and next year's earnings estimates, not long term earnings growth estimates and not their buy/hold/sell rankings.  TSM's third screen requires PEG '05 to be less than 1.10 and PEG '06 to be less than 1.50.

So there you have the method, three screens provided weekly identify fundamentally sound stocks with earnings fuel and with value left.  Additionally, each TSM stock's price must be greater than $20; its 50 day average trading volume must be greater than 150k, and its market capitalization rate must be greater than $500 million. 

The following two tables summarize the 2004 trading and folio accounts.  A total of 233 short-term trades (1,000 shares each) were taken.  They resulted in 136 winners and 97 losers for an average 0.97 percent return per trade (39 percent annualized), each lasting 9.1 days.  The resulting profit was $87,760 ($376.65 per trade).   

Trade Summary: 233 Trades 9/15/03 and 12/30/04
# Winners # Losers % Winners Avg. Win ($) Avg. Loss ($) Total Profit ($) Avg Profit ($) Avg Return (%) Annualized Return (%) Avg Time in Trade (days)
136 97 58.37% 2.17 -2.14 87,760 376.65

0.97%

39.00%

9.10

When each week's TSM list was invested in a folio (each averaging 24.3 stocks) and these folios were then held for 33 days before selling, 32 such folios produced 25 winners with an average return of +2.23 percent.  The component stocks produced 488 winners and 288 losers (15 winners and 9 losers per weekly folio) with an average return of 2.60 percent over the 33 days  A $100k account grew to $114,588 for the year (better than the $108,503 of the S&P 500).  Complete trade documentation can be found here.  Note, this is a very conservative approach that is far less exposed to individual stock miss-steps (like the Russian government's sudden tax liabilities imposed on VIP).  The folio approach doesn't provide us the return of its individual stock plays because cash enters the market on a dollar-cost-averaging basis; it fully deploys over five weeks following re-entry after a stop loss exit.

Trade Summary: 39 Folios from 1/02/04 to 12/31/04
Folio or Member Stocks # Winners # Losers % Winners Folio Growth from $100k Avg Return (%) S&P Growth from $100k Avg Return (%) Avg Time in Trade (days)
Folio 32 7 78.13% 114,588 2.23% 108,503 0.86% 33
Stocks 488 288 62.89%   2.60%      

Short Term TSM Trades:  Each day 0 to 5 trades are described in the Daily "Before the Bell" TSM Report.  This watch list of stocks has passed through the triple screening criteria.  Trades are chosen based on technical criteria: breakouts, multi-day pullbacks, or new 21-day lows.  Trade management criteria are included for each trade as well.  In each case, a buy point and three sell points are identified.  If the trade plays out perfectly, one-half the position (500 shares) is sold when price rises $1 above the buy point, and the stop for the second half is then raised near the buy point. As the trade develops further, a two-day trailing stop is used till eventually the second 500 shares are sold.  TASR, trade # 134, was the most profitable example, a trade that returned 35.2 percent over 20 days. 

Should the trade go bad (and about 40 percent will), the first half of the position (500 shares) is sold at the technical stop loss point, then the second 500 shares at the 7 percent final loss point should price continue to fall.  The idea is to take 1/2 profits quickly and reset the stop-loss point so a position with a $1 profit never runs into a loss, then let the second 1/2 profits run as high as possible.  Conversely, the max loss is ideally limited to 7 percent for 1/2 the position and less for the other half.  Occasionally, larger loses do develop because of opening gaps.  The distribution of returns is shown in the following chart.  The 233 trades resulted in 58.4 percent wins with an average return of +0.97 percent over 9.1 days (39 percent annualized). 

              Profit = (# Trades)*(Shares per Trade)*[win rate*(average win) - loss rate*(average loss)]
                       =   (233)     *      (1,000)           * [   0.5837*($2.17)       -        0.4163*($2.14)               =                                          $87,549

Successful trading is all about finding an approach that makes sense, being disciplined enough to follow the plan, and executing it over and over again.  Here, one could improve profit by (1) making more trades, (2) trading more shares, (3) increasing the win rate, or (4) increasing the average win amount.  This approach will return about 60 percent in a range-bound market.  In a market with a strong bullish trend, the return rate will be much greater.

Long Term TSM Folio Trades:  Folio investing is longer term oriented, utilizing more stocks (better diversification with less risk), and requiring far less time.  Folios, in effect, allow one to set up a mutual fund based on TSM stocks, hold as many as 150 stocks in three folios, make 600 trades monthly (even for partial shares), and all at a cost of $39.95/month (even cheaper plans are available).  Link here for further information.

Though several approaches might be used, and a hybrid method utilizing combination of short-term trades and longer-term holding of TSM stocks is described in TSM Methods, the approach described here holds each set of TSM stocks over a ~33-day period.  To get started, one divides his investment capital into five equal lots (described here as lots A through E).  On Thursday morning (after the new Wednesday evening set of TSM stocks) one initially invests $20,000 (assuming a $100,000 account) equally among that week's TSM stocks.  The next week, another $20,000 is invested in a new list of new TSM stocks, many of which carry over from the previous week.  In effect, repeating stocks overweight in the account.  During 2004, 776 TSM stocks were identified in 32 TSM folios of which only 160 were unique (each stock averaged appearing in 4.84 TSM lists). Find the 2004 TSM folio trade history here.

This approach continues until lot E stocks is invested in the fifth week, then in the sixth week, lot A stocks would be sold and the money reinvested in new lot A stocks.  Because of the dollar cost averaging and diversification in each folio, stops need not be set at 7 percent limits.  If at any time, the account loses 3 percent from its highest balance, all lots are immediately sold; TSM stocks continue to be paper traded, but trades are not taken again until the first month following a month of positive returns.  For example, in week two, the account dropped to $97,000; both lots A and B were sold, and the account remained in cash until week 9 (2/26/04) produced a positive return.  Our initial investment this time was $97,000/5 in week 10 (3/04/04).  Following this approach, 32 of the 49 weekly TSM lists were invested with 25 proving profitable (averaging a 2.23 percent return over 33 days where S&P similarly treated produced +0.86 percent).  The $100,000 account grew to $114,588; 776 TSM stocks were purchased with 62.9 percent winners and averaging a +2.60 percent return.

The folio approach offers much greater diversification, and it's an approach not as impacted by one stock turning bad.  The following charts show the distribution of returns and the frequency of stock participation.

This folio approach allow us to take another look at the profit potential of individual TSM stock trades.

                           Profit = (# Trades)*(Shares per Trade)*[win rate*(average win) - loss rate*(average loss)]
                                     =   (776)     *      (20)              * [   0.629*($3.85)       -        0.371*($3.99)      ]
                                     =                                          $14,610

In summary, the TSM trading approach produced a 58.4 percent win rate and the folio approach a 62.9 percent win rate.  The key, again, is trade management discipline.

Now that I've discussed the trader and investor approach to TSM stock investing and provided the 2004 results, let me say that you may well favor other approaches like holding the TSM stocks longer or using a hybrid approach of short-term trading and long-term folio investing (both in the same folio).  But in either case, I think that you'll agree that the TSM approach offers a quality watch list of stocks to trade or invest in. 

The following will be offered in our commercial service:  1 to 5 daily trades in TSM stocks with complete trade management criteria and a weekly list of TSM stocks to fund your folio.   Further, this year I will be implementing sector rotation criteria into the TSM recommendations, and continue to keep you abreast of the important cycles playing themselves out in the market.